A Comparative Study of Software Quality Assurance Approaches in AI-Enabled Electronic Health Record Systems

Authors

  • Aahil Danish Healthcare Engineer, Oman. Author

Keywords:

Electronic Health Records, Artificial Intelligence, Software Quality Assurance, Agile Testing, Medical Informatics, Health IT, Risk Management, AI Validation, Clinical Decision Support

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems has revolutionized healthcare delivery, enhancing diagnostics, patient management, and administrative efficiency. However, the rapid expansion of AI in health informatics introduces unique challenges in ensuring software quality. This paper presents a comparative study of prevailing Software Quality Assurance (SQA) methodologies as applied to AI-enabled EHR systems. We analyze traditional, agile, and AI-specific quality assurance models, identifying gaps in adaptability, testing strategies, and regulatory compliance. Through a synthesis of recent literature and analytical visualizations, we recommend a hybrid, risk-driven SQA model tailored for AI health informatics. This study contributes to the understanding of how SQA methods must evolve to meet the safety, reliability, and ethical imperatives in AI-based medical software.

References

Jiang, Y., et al. "Evaluating SQA Frameworks in AI-Enhanced Clinical Systems." Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 113, no. 4, 2021, pp. 45–56.

Lee, H., and Kim, S. "Adaptive Quality Assurance in EHRs with Embedded AI." Health Informatics Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, 2020, pp. 110–125.

Sharma, R., Patel, M., and Singh, A. "Comparative QA Metrics in Agile Health Software Development." International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 128, no. 7, 2019, pp. 90–102.

Benson, R., and Tang, J. "Post-Deployment Quality Monitoring in AI-EHRs." Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 128, no. 1, 2022, pp. 20–34.

Smith, L., Anderson, T., and Lopez, K. "Regulatory Gaps in QA for AI-Powered Clinical Systems." Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, pp. 77–89.

Li, T., and Zhou, M. "Hybrid QA Models for Medical AI Systems." Software Quality Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, 2021, pp. 133–149.

Ahn, J., and Rivera, D. "Addressing Bias and Fairness in QA for Health AI." Health Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, 2018, pp. 215–228.

Patel, V., and Nguyen, H. "Clinician-Centered Quality Assurance in EHR AI." Journal of Health Information Science, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019, pp. 10–23.

Kumar, S., Roy, P., and Das, L. "SQA Strategies for Machine Learning in Healthcare." Medical Software Review, vol. 22, no. 3, 2020, pp. 58–70.

Chang, W., and Lo, F. "Explainability and QA in Clinical Decision Systems." Journal of Clinical AI, vol. 4, no. 2, 2021, pp. 30–42.

Morris, A., and Davis, P. "Validation of Learning Systems in EHR QA." Journal of Systems Health, vol. 19, no. 5, 2019, pp. 101–114.

Rezaei, N., and Clark, G. "Risk Management in AI Clinical Systems." Health Technology Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 67–80.

Foster, E., and Zhang, Y. "Test Automation for AI-Driven Medical Software." Quality in Health Informatics, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021, pp. 88–97.

Han, L., and Wu, T. "Continuous QA Integration in AI Medical Apps." Clinical Informatics Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, pp. 125–139.

Murphy, K., Sullivan, D., and Chen, M. "Governance Challenges in QA of Health AI." Journal of Health Regulation Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, 2022, pp. 51–65.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-22

How to Cite

A Comparative Study of Software Quality Assurance Approaches in AI-Enabled Electronic Health Record Systems. (2024). GLOBAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 5(1), 6-11. https://gjmrd.com/index.php/GJMRD/article/view/GJMRD.5.1.002